이름 or 단체명
토도톡
토도톡
Wroclaw International School, British International School of Wroclaw
[Group 4] 10. 불평등 완화 11. 지속가능한 도시 12. 지속가능한 소비/생산
지속가능한 도시를 위한 정책 제안 / 폴란드 브로츠와프(Wroclaw)의 환경 문제를 중심으로
SDGs :그룹 6. 지속가능한 도시
우리 팀은 “지속가능한 도시"를 주제로 폴란드 브로츠와프(Wroclaw)를 중심으로 중요한 도시 문제를 파악하고, 환경과 관련된 지속 가능한 도시 정책 아이디어를 제안한다. 이를 위해 100명을 대상으로 한 설문조사를 통해 Wroclaw 시민들이 중요하게 생각하고 있는 도시 문제를 파악하였고 환경과 관련한 지속가능한 도시 정책 아이디어를 도출하였다. 설문지는 폴란드가 유엔에 제시한 자발적 지속가능한 발전 목표(Voluntary National Review) 3가지를 중심으로 구성하였다.
설문조사 결과 사회적으로는 빈곤문제, 경제적으로는 강력한 현대산업의 건실이 필요하다고 응답한 비율이 가장 높았다. 또한 환경 문제와 관련하여 분리수거와 대기 오염의 심각성 가장 중요한 도시 문제로 생각하였다. 이를 바탕으로 지속 가능한 도시 환경을 위한 3가지 정책은 다음과 같다.
첫째, 바코드 인식 분리수거 도우미를 설치한다. 상품에 가격 정보 외에 분리수거 정보를 입력한 바코드를 의무화하고, “바코드 인식 분리수거 도우미"에 찍으면 상품의 분리수거 방법, 분리수거를 정확하게 했을 시 절감되는 산소량을 알려주는 기계이다.
둘째, 대기 질 향상을 위한 “환경 지킴이 카드”를 제공한다. 폴란드의 대기 질 개선은 가장 강력한 폴란드 정부의 환경 목표이다. 노후 경유차량을 자발적으로 폐차하는 대신 2년 동안 사용할 수 있는 무료 대중교통 이용권을 제공하는 것이다. 이 또한 대중교통을 이용할 때 마다 줄어든 탄소의 양을 카드에 기록하도록 하여 2년 후 카드 반납 시 새차 지원과 같은 적절한 보상을 한다.
셋째, 청소년 대상 중고등학교에서 지속가능한발전 교육을 실시하여 미래세대의 주인인 청소년이 지속가능한 발전에 관심을 갖을 수 있도록 한다.
우리는 이번 연구를 통해 지역과 도시의 문제들이 도시에 살고 있는 개개인과 국가 그리고 전 인류가 함께 해결해야 하는 문제라는 것을 알았고, 미래 세대인 청소년을 위해 느리더라도 멀리 갈 수 있는 지속 가능한 발전이 이루어져야 한다고 느꼈다.
안녕하세요 ‘토도톡’ 님
저희는 [GROUP 1]의 ‘늘품’ 입니다.
발표영상과 보고서 모두 너무 감명깊게 잘 보았습니다. 발표내용과 관련해 여쭈어 보고 싶은 내용이 있습니다.
여러분의 주장은 원활한 분리수거를 위해 참신한 아이디어라고 생각합니다.
바코드 인식 분리수거는 사람들이 분리수거를 보다 제대로 할 수 있는 방법이라고 생각합니다만
모든 상품에 바코드를 부착하는 것은 힘들다고 생각합니다. 이에 관해서는 어떻게 하실 건지 궁금합니다.
또한, 분리수거를 하기 위해 많은 시간이 들게 된다면, 그만큼 사람들이 그에 맞춰서 행할지도 의문입니다.
이에 대해서는 어떻게 생각하시나요?
소중한 의견 부탁드립니다. 이상 [GROUP 1]의 ‘늘품’ 이였습니다.
안녕하세요 토도톡 팀 여러분, 저는 이번 청소년미래정책포럼 멘토 최윤하입니다. 준비해주신 보고서 잘 읽었습니다! 전세계를 포괄하는 보편적인 해결책이 아닌 하나의 도시에 집중하여, 문제를 파악하고 해결책을 제안한 것이 인상적이었습니다. 특히 재활용품 분류가 제대로 되고있지 않다는 문제를 ‘바코드 인식 분리수거 도우미’와 같은 창의적인 방법으로 해결하려 했다는 것을 가장 인상깊게 보았습니다. 제가 현재 전공하고 있는 분야가 UI/UX 디자인 관련이다보니, 제안한 제품과 서비스에 대해 궁굼증이 생겼습니다.
한국같은 경우, 재활용이 비교적 잘되고 있어 ‘재활용 강국’으로도 통하지만, 전문가들은 통계가 현실을 반영하지 못하고 있으며 실제로 재활용률이 40%밖에 되지 않는다고 지적했습니다. 그 이유는 품목별로 제대로 분류하고 ‘비우기’, ‘헹구기’, ‘섞지 않기’ 등과 같은 원칙들을 잘 준수해야하지만, 실제로 실천되고 있지 않다는 것이었습니다. 제가 지난 학기에 재활용 관련 인터뷰와 설문조사를 진행했을 때, 실천하지 않는 이유에 대해 ‘잘 모르기 때문’과 ‘알아도 귀찮기 때문’이라는 답변을 가장 많이 받았습니다. 토도톡팀이 한국을 중심으로 해결책을 제안한 것은 아니었으나, 브로츠와프에서도 비슷한 생각의 사람들이 존재한다면 바코드를 이용하여 재활용 관련 정보를 받을 수 있어도, 실천을 유도할 정도로 효과적인 인센티브일까하는 의문이 들었습니다. 사용자들에게 효과적인 서비스와 제품을 제공하기 위해서는 UX research가 뒷받침되어야하는데, 분리수거가 제대로 이루어지지 않는 이유에 대해서는 조사하신건가요? 하셨다면, 이유가 무엇인가요?
안녕하세요.
그룹4의 학생회2입니다.
저희들도 쓰레기분리등의 문제를 다루고 있는데요.
토도톡님은 바코드로인해 적절한 분리를 실천할 수 있다고 했지만
과연 바코드를 붙인다고 효과가 있을까요.
귀찮아서 상식적인 분리도차 못하는게 형상인것 같아요.
바코드붙여도 귀찮다고 느낄지 않을까요.
이러한 점에서 다른 대책은 간단히 무엇이 있을까요.
소중한 답장 부탁드립니다.
정재영
2021년 3월 22일 at 9:42 오전안녕하세요, Group 4의 Graded P
팀의 정재영입니다.
First, the presentation(PPT) was awesome and I loved the formating of the presentation. The presentation contained some pieces of information that are interesting. Ideally, the bar code machine will be a great idea if it is possible for the state governors or some companies to allocate those machines to some densely populated areas such as apartments, companies, avenues, Etc. During the presentation, your group introduced that when the barcode of the product is scanned through the machine, it is possible to recycle or discard those trashes effectively. However, wouldn’t it be uncomfortable for those customers to use these devices and to scan all the barcodes one by one to use this system?. Trashes are often discarded with various types of materials such as plastics, aluminum, etc. And if we are making the customers or other workers use this infra, it would take more time and more effort for these people to discard those trashes. What would be a possible solution to make people to be incentivized to use this system? In addition, your group was talking about some rewards when individual citizens scrape their old cars/ level 5 fuel efficiency cars. However, the price of scraping individual cars will be paid by individuals, and even though the card is given to them, many people will buy their own cars for about 1-2 years as your group proposed. Then, wouldn’t it also arise some of the factory’s manufacturing acceleration which leads to more CO2 emission?. Since more demands are going to happen, more car companies are going to make new cars which will naturally lead to more co2 emissions in our society. What will be the possible solution to this radical problem? Adding on to this argument, some developing countries don’t have a public transformation or has a minor infra of public transportations; meaning that transportations only provides access to some areas in these countries. Would those individual citizens who have an old car feel merited to this policy? And what is going to be your group’s solution until 2030 for these people? Finally, would education possibly succeed in some developing countries or some countries that are having serious conditions due to covid-19’s infection?. For instance, in some developing countries, 40% of children don’t even have a chance to get those fundamental educations that are necessarily for them. In this harsh condition, would education become a possible solution for the next generation? If the UN intervenes in this problem, how will they teach the increasing populations in developing countries? I am looking forward to some great answers:).
Thank you,
정재영 올림
류민주
2021년 3월 22일 at 9:12 오후안녕하세요, Graded P팀의 정재영님, 토도톡, 류민주 입니다. 우선 저희 보고서와 PPT 를 보고 자세한 답변 감사드립니다.
First, we will answer the question that it would be inconvenient for customers to scan all barcodes one by one in order to use the sorting system.
The purpose of our sorting machine is in the form of detailed audio and visual guides for items for people who don’t know how to sort accurately. The important fact is that they can pick up the semi-automatic lid and throw away the trash as usual. Therefore, it is convenient and efficient to separate collections for busy workers as well. A solution for encouraging people to devote to this system is to accumulate separate collection points to residents who have done the right sorting. Those separate collection points will give a lot of discounts on eco-friendly brands such as Amorepacific and Nespresso especially shops around their home. In this way, awareness of the environment can be raised and residents for a sustainable future.
Secondly, it is our position that the CO2 emitted from automobile production is not an improvement in the morning in terms of the international economy and globalization. But what we’ve noticed is the impact of CO2 from older vehicles (노후경유차). As a result of a study by the Transportation Environment Research Institute of the National Institute of Environmental Sciences(국립환경과학원 교통환경연구소), old diesel vehicles emit carbon dioxide 1.2 times more than normal gasoline vehicles. In addition, the expression of “carbon neutrality” has also begun to be used in the automobile industry, which means that carbon dioxide is absorbed as much as it is emitted, resulting in zero-emission. Also, carbon neutrality is now reduced in all production processes. Currently, the world is working hard to make it happen. However, most of the old vehicles do not have a device to filter the exhaust gas, and the performance is not good. That is why we think that carbon emissions from old vehicles are worse than carbon emissions from automobile production. In addition, I would like to emphasize that the purpose of our group’s “Environmental Protection Card for Improving Air Quality”(환경지킴이 카드) is to “reduce” the amount of oxygen emitted, not to create zero.
You have mentioned that the public transport infrastructure of some developing countries is poor, and I would like to remind you that the theme of our group is “Policy Proposal for a Sustainable Cities/Environmental Issues in Wroclaw, Poland”. But by 2030, if this idea is going to spread all over the world, I think it’s definitely something to consider in the future.
Finally, as for ESD(Education for Sustainable Development), if it is converted to the regular mandatory education curriculum of the Polish government, we aim to raise awareness of the importance of SDG as it is a matter directly connected to the happy life of youths who will live in the future.
Thank you for your interest and considerate questions from various perspectives on our Group Policy and Idea Proposal. We really appreciate them. I hope my answers respond to your questions.
Todotalk
정재영
2021년 3월 23일 at 12:01 오전Thank you for the good reply there. Almost all of my doubts have been resolved. However, I still have a question about the public transportation part. If those people are living in rural areas? It is possible to infer that some rural areas of the cities are going to have some type of disadvantages if they are going to discard their cars. According to the presentation, it was mentioned that those people who ride more public transportation will have more supportive money to buy a new car. However, some rural area’s citizens can’t have the benefit of public transportations as much as those people who live in the central place of the city. What would be the possible solution for them? Since Taxi is clarified as private transportation, how will these minority groups be satisfied with your policies?
Additionally, some people need to use some facilities that require cars. what would be a possible solution for them? For instance, during this quarantine, there are a lot of services such as drive-through, covid-19 tests done inside the cars, etc. And as I mentioned before, a taxi can’t be a solution to this problem.
Thank you,
Graded P팀
박지호
2021년 3월 24일 at 4:45 오후Hello, This is Todotalk. Thank you for paying attention to our report.
First of all, I would like to tell you about the city Wrocław transportation system that we have investigated through the City Hall website of Wroclaw. There are 120 bus routes, 23 tram (ground subway) routes and a lot of convenient transportation. In addition, construction of the tramway began in 2020 with 50 new buses and 10 trams. According to data from the Central Statistical Office (BDL GUS) Regional Data Bank, as of the end of 2019, 38,411,148 people lived in Poland.
Based on this, the citizens of the city of Wrocław, Poland’s fourth most populous city, see that trams are more established as a private means of transport. The number of passengers on public transport in Wrocław is increasing continuously. Annually 270 million, or 500,000 passengers per day, use the services of Wrocław MPK (Wroclaw’s municipal transport company). It is true that people in rural areas cannot benefit from public transportation more than those in city central. ‘
However, according to the 2012 of the Korea Rural Economic Research Institute, it was approved to use small vans (11-15 passengers) as buses to improve public transportation in rural areas. The institute said that they are considering a demand-response(수요응답형) bus, a method that runs in front of the house through the app. Nearly 10 years after the report was written, demand-response buses are operating nationwide such as Goheung(고흥), Wando Hongseong(완도 흥성), and Asan(아산). That is why I think that if these public transport systems are improved globally, people in rural areas will be able to fully enjoy the benefits of public transport. As for the damage to the taxi industry that can be caused by environmental protection cards that we suggested, we believe that decrease in demand due to free public transportation will be the most fatal.
Lastly, we would like to answer about the drive-through (corona 19 test conducted inside a vehicle) among facilities that require automobiles. Out of a total of 700 screening tests distributed across Korea, only about 30 locations are operating drive-through. There are about 600 screening tests in Poland, of which about 100 are operating drive-through. Although this may increase the risk of corona infection a little, all screening tests are distributed enough to be transported by public transport or on foot. Thus it is safe to visit the test centers around where they live, including people who do not own a car because they do not have a driver’s license.
Hope this has answered additional questions. Thank you so much.
ToDoTalk